Referencias bibliográficas para el curso
En esta lista incluimos los artículos recomendados
para el material de
la clases. Estan listados en el orden de temas según el programa del
curso. En cada bloque hemos marcado al menos uno (>) por
considerarlo
básico en esa categoria. Si disponemos de ellos en PDF, hemos incluido
un enlace. Los demás ... si navegando los encuentran en PDF
agradeceremos nos los envien para ponerlos en linea aqui.
INTRODUCCION
Bookstein F L, Slice D
E, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P. 2004. Anthropology
takes control of morphometrics. Coll. Antropol. 28 Suppl 2:121-32.
Marcus, L. F. 1990. Traditional Morphometrics.
En: F. J. Rohlf
&
F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics
Workshop. Special Publication 2, The University of Michigan Museum of
Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 77-122.
> Slice, D. E. 2007. Geometric Morphometrics.
Annual Review of
Anthropology 36: 261-281.
Snedecor, G.W. 1954. Chp
1 Biometry, its makers and
concepts. En:
Kempthorne, O. et al (ed) Satistics and Mathematics in Biology. Iiowa
State College Press. pp 3-10.
Reyment et al 1984. Chp
4 Some simple forerunners of
multivariate morphometrics. En: Reyment, R. A., R. E. Blackith & N.
A. Campbell. Multivariate morphometrics. Academic Press, London.
pp 27-31.
Rohlf, F. J. 1990.
Morphometrics. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics 21: 299-316.
PROBABILIDAD Y ESCALAS
Mayo, D.G. 1996. Chp
1. Learning from error. En: "Error and the growth
of experimental knowledge" The University of Chicago Press. pp
1-20.
Goldstein, M & I.F. Goldstein. 1978. Chp 10.
Measurement and its
pitfalls. En: "How we know, an exploration of the scientific process"
Da Capo Press, New York. pp 231-241.
> Giere, R.N. 1979. Chp 9. Statistics, Correlations, and
Causal
Hypotheses. En: "Understanding Scientific Reasoning". Holt,
Rinehart & Winston. P165-183.
Giere, R.N. 1979. Chp 11. Testing Statistical
Hypotheses. En:
Understanding Scientific Reasoning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
P 209-246.
IMAGENES
MacLeod, N.
1990. Chp. 2. Digital images and automated image
analysis systems. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.).
Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication
# 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology., Ann Arbor. Pp.
21-35.
> Rohlf, F. J. 1990. Chp. 3. An overview of image
processing and analysis
techniques for morphometrics. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein
(eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop.
Special Publication # 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of
Zoology., Ann Arbor. Pp. 37-60.
Costa, L. F. & Cesar, R. M. 2001. Chp 3. Shape
acquisition and
processing. P 197-217. En: Shape analysis and Classification. Theory
and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl. Pp 659.
VECTORES
> Wickens, T. D. 1995.
Chp. 2. Some vector geometry. En: The
Geometry of Multivariate Statistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publ.
Hillsdale NJ. Pp 9-30.
Costa, Lda Fontura & Cesar, R. M. 2001. Chp. 2.2.
Basic
mathematical concepts. Linear Algebra. En: Shape analysis and
Classification. Theory and Practice. CRC Press. Pp 51-90.
Manly, B. F.J. 1986. Chp. 2. Matrix Algebra. En:
Multivariate Statistical Methods. A primer. Chapman and Hall. pp 17-25.
????. Chp 15. Mathematical tools for multivariate
character analysis.
Pp 333-353. {alguien tendrá los detalles de la referencia
bibliográfica?}
Zheng, Yuxi. ????. Chapter 1 Vectors and Tensors. ???? {alguien tendrá los detalles de la referencia
bibliográfica?}
MÉTODOS DE REGISTRO DE MARCAS
Albert MH, et al 2003.
Assessing landmark influence on shape variation. Biometrika 90(3):669–78
> Mousseau, T. A. 1991. Landmarks in Morphometrics, or
shape and size of Morphometrics to come. Evolution 45: 1979-1980
Bookstein, F. L., R. E. Straus, J. M. Humpries, B.
Chernoff, R. L.
Elder and G. R. Smith. 1982. A comment upon the uses of Fourier methods
in Systematics. Systematic Zoology 31: 85-92.
Strauss, R.E. & F.L. Bookstein. 1982. The truss:
Body form reconstructions in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31:
113-135.
McLellan, T. & J. A. Endler. 1998. The
relative success of
some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects.
Systematic Biology 47: 264-281.
Dickinson et al. 1987. Another approach to leaf shape
comparisons. Taxon 36: 1-20.
Navarro, N, X. Zatarain & S. Montuire.
2004
Effects of morphometric descriptor changes on statistical
classification and morphospaces. Biol . J. Linnean Soc. 83: 243-260.
Fink, W. 1990. Chp 1 Data acquisition for morphometric
analysis in
Systematic Biology. En: Rohlf J & F. L. Bookstein. Proceedings of
the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2, The
University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. Ann Arbor. P 9-19.
> O´Higgins, P. O. Chp 4. Methodological issues in the
description of
forms. En: P. E. Lestrel (ed). Fourier descriptors and their
applications in Biology. Cambridge University Press. pp 74-105.
Sheets, HD, et al. 2006. Comparison
of geometric
morphometric outline methods in the discrimination of age-related
differences in feather shape. Frontiers in Zoology 3: 15.
ESPACIOS MORFOMETRICOS Y PROYECCIONES
> Adams, D.C. F.J Rohlf
& D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics:
Ten Years of progress following the ´revolution´. Italian Journal of
Zoology 71: 5-16.
Bookstein, F. L. 1996. Combining the tools of
Geometric morphometrics.
En: L. F. Marcus & al (eds). Advances in Morphometrics. Pp 131-151
Bookstein, F. L. 1982. Foundations of Morphometrics.
Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 451-470.
Monteiro, L. R. , B. Bordin & S. F. dos Reis.
2000. Shape
distances, shape spaces and the comparison of morphometric methods.
TREE 15:217- 220.
Richtsmeier, J. T. V. B. Deleon & S. R. Lele.
2002. The promise of
Geometric Morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 45: 68-91.
> Rohlf FJ. 1999. Shape Statistics: Procrustes
Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces. J. Classification 16: 197-223.
Rohlf, F. J. and L. F. Marcus. 1993. A revolution in
Morphometrics. TREE 8(4): 129-132.
> Rohlf, F. J. 1996. Morphometric spaces, shape
components and the
effects of linear transformations. En: L. F. Marcus & al (eds).
Advances in Morphometrics. Pp 117-129.
Rohlf, FJ & FL Bookstein 2003. Computing the
Uniform Component of Shape Variation. Syst. Biol. 52: 66-69.
Slice, D. E. 2001. Landmark Coordinates Aligned by
Procrustes Analysis
do not lie in Kendall’s Shape Space. Syst. Biol 50: 141-149.
Slice, D. E. 2005. Chp. 1. Modern Morphometrics. En:
Slice, D. E. (ed).
Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer Academic/ PLenum
Press. New York. pp 1-45.
Zelditch et al 2004. Chp. 1. Introduction. En:
Zelditch ML, Swiderski,
HD Sheets & WL Fink. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A
primer. Elsevier Academic Press.
ESTADISTICA
Chatfield, C. 1988.
Chp 5. Analysing the data. General strategy. En:
Problem solving: a statistician’s guide. Chapmann and Hall, p 13-21.
Lele, S & J. T. Richtsmeier, 1990. Statistical
models in Morphometrics: are they realistic?. Systematic Zoology: 39:
60-69.
Lewontin, R.C. 1966. On the measurement of
relative variability. Systematic Zoology 141-142.
Mayr E. 1969. Chp 8, The qualitative and quantitative
analysis of
variation, En: "Principles of Systematic Zoology" McGraw-Hill. Pp
144-197.
Strauss RE & MN Atanassov. 2006. Determining best
complete subsets
of specimens and characters for multivariate morphometric studies in
the presence of large amounts of missing data. Biol. J. Linnean Soc.
88: 309-328.
SYSTAT. 1992. Chp 1 Introduction to statistics. En:
"Statistics Manual" Systat Inc.
Stanley, J. 1963. Chp 12 The Analysis of Variance. En:
The essence of biometry. McGill University Press. Montreal. P 120-126.
> Van Valen, L. 1978. The statistics of variation.
Evolutionary Theory 4: 33-43.
> Zar, J. H. 1996. Chp 1 Introduction, Chp 2 Populations
and samples. Chp
3 Measures of central tendency, Chp 4 Measures of Dispersion and
Variability. En: "Biostatistical Analysis" Prentice Hall. P1-45.
METODOS DE ORDENACIÓN
Chatfield, C. 1988.
Appendix A.13 A digest of statistical
techniques. Multivariate analysis. En: Problem solving. A
statistician's guide. Chapman and Hall. p219-222.
Albrecht, G. H. 1979. The study of Biological versus
Statistical
variation in multivariate morphometrics: the descriptive use of
multiple regression analysis. Systematic Zoology 28: 338-344.
> Campbell, N. A. & W. R. Atchley. 1981. The
geometry of canonical variate analysis. Systematic Zoology 30: 268-280.
James, F. C. and C. E. McCulloch. 1990. Multivariate
analysis in
ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's box. Ann. Rev. Ecol.
Syst. 21: 129-166.
Rohlf, F. J. & F. L. Bookstein. 1987. A comment on
shearing as a
method for "size correction". Systematic Zoology 36: 356-367.
Somers, K. M. 1989. Allometry, Isometry and shape in
Principal Components Analysis. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 169-173.
Sundberg P. 1989. Shape and size-constrained Principal
Components Analysis. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 166-168.
APLICACIONES
Gould S.J. 1971.
Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a
contribution to the problem of scaling in the evolution of size.
American Naturalist 105: 113-135.
Kellner, J. R. & R. A. Alford. 2003. The ontogeny
of Fluctuating Asymmetry. The American Naturalist 161: 931-947.
Rohlf, FJ 1998. On Applications of Geometric
Morphometrics to studies of Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Systematic Biology
47: 147-158.
Simpson et al 1960. Chp 15 Growth. En: Simpson, G. G.,
A. Roe & R.
C. Lewontin. "Quantitative Zoology". Harcourt, Brace and Company,
New York. P373-420.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Chp1 The size of
living things, Chp 2
Problems of size and scale, Chp 3 The use of allometry. En: Scaling.
Why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
P 1-32.
Smith, 1990. Chp 17 Homology in morphometrics
and phylogenetics.
En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the
Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2. The
University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology., Ann Arbor. pp. 325-338.
Swiderski, D. L., M. L. Zelditch and W. L. Fink.
1998. Why
morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic
analysis. Systematic Biology 47: 508-519.
Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, et al. 1995.
Morphometrics, homology, and
phylogenetics: quantified character as synapomorphies. Systematic
Biology 44: 179-189.
Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, et al. 1998. On
applications of geometric
morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: A reply to Rohlf.
Systematic Biology 47(1): 159-167.
Zelditch, M. L. and W. L. Fink. 1998. Partial Warps,
Phylogeny and
Ontogeny: A reply to Adams and Rosenberg. Systematic Biology 47(2):
345-348.
Zelditch et al 2000. Chp 3 Discovery of phylogenetic
characters in
morphometric data. En Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. J.J.
Weins (ed). Smithsonian Institution Press. P37-83.
|
