Morfometría Geometrica Referencias

Curso: "Introducción a la MORFOMETRÍA GEOMÉTRICA"

Inicio Programa Clases (PDFs) Referencias Libros Software Imágenes Enlaces

Referencias
Los artículos en esta lista son los recomendados para el material de la clases. Estan listados en el orden de temas según el programa del curso. En cada bloque hemos resaltado al menos uno que consideramos básico en esa categoria. Si disponemos de ellos en PDF, hemos incluido un enlace, señalado con el icono de Adobe PDF. Los demás los llevaremos en papel para sacar fotocopias. Si navegando los encuentran en PDF agradeceremos su colaboración.

Introducción
	Snedecor, G.W. 1954	Chp 1 Biometry, its makers and concepts. En: Kempthorne, O. et al (ed) Satistics and Mathematics in Biology. Iiowa State College Press. pp 3-10.
	Reyment et al 1984	Chp 4 Some simple forerunners of multivariate morphometrics. En: Reyment, R. A., R. E. Blackith & N. A. Campbell. Multivariate morphometrics. Academic Press, London. pp 27-31.
	Marcus, L. F. 1990.	Traditional Morphometrics. En: F. J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication 2, The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan. pp. 77-122.
	Rohlf, F.J. 1990.	Morphometrics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 299-316.
	Slice, DE. 2007.	Geometric Morphometrics. Annual Review of Anthropology 36: 261-281
	Bookstein F L, Slice D E, Gunz P, Mitteroecker P. 2004	Anthropology takes control of morphometrics. Coll. Antropol. 28 Suppl 2:121-32.
Hipótesis probabilísticas, escalas, mediciones, error.
	Mayo, D.G. 1996.	Chp 1. Learning from error. En: "Error and the growth of experimental knowledge" The University of Chicago Press. pp 1-20.
	Goldstein, M & I.F. Goldstein. 1978.	Chp 10. Measurement and its pitfalls. En: "How we know, an exploration of the scientific process" Da Capo Press, New York. pp 231-241.
	Giere, R.N. 1979	Chp 9. Statistics, Correlations, and Causal Hypotheses. En: "Understanding Scientific Reasoning". Holt, Rinehart & Winston. P165-183.
	Giere, R.N. 1979	Chp 11. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. En: Understanding Scientific Reasoning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. P 209-246.
Imágenes: digitalización, pixeles, procesamiento, despliegue y análisis
	MacLeod, N. 1990.	Chp. 2. Digital images and automated image analysis systems. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology., Ann Arbor. Pp. 21-35.
	Rohlf, F. J. 1990.	Chp. 3. An overview of image processing and analysis techniques for morphometrics. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology., Ann Arbor. Pp. 37-60.
	Costa, L. F. & Cesar, R. M. 2001.	Chp 3. Shape acquisition and processing. P 197-217. En: Shape analysis and Classification. Theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl. Pp 659.
Vectores: geometría, suma, producto, combinación lineal.
	Wickens, T. D. 1995.	Chp. 2. Some vector geometry. En: The Geometry of Multivariate Statistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publ. Hillsdale NJ. Pp 9-30
	Costa, Lda Fontura & Cesar, R. M. 2001.		Chp. 2.2. Basic mathematical concepts. Linear Algebra. En: Shape analysis and Classification. Theory and Practice. CRC Press. Pp 51-90.
	Manly, B. F.J. 1986.		Chp. 2. Matrix Algebra. En: Multivariate Statistical Methods. A primer. Chapman and Hall. pp 17-25.
	?		Chp 15. Mathematical tools for multivariate character analysis. Pp 333-353. {alguien tendrá los detalles de la referencia bibliográfica?}
Métodos de registro: distancias, contornos y coordenadas
	Albert MH, et al 2003		Assessing landmark influence on shape variation. Biometrika 90(3):669–78
	Mousseau, T. A. 1991.		Landmarks in Morphometrics, or shape and size of Morphometrics to come. Evolution 45: 1979-1980
	Bookstein et al 1982.		Bookstein, F. L., R. E. Straus, J. M. Humpries, B. Chernoff, R. L. Elder and G. R. Smith. A comment upon the uses of Fourier methods in Systematics. Systematic Zoology 31: 85-92.
	Strauss, R.E. & F.L. Bookstein. 1982.		The truss: Body form reconstructions in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31: 113-135.
	McLellan, T. & J. A. Endler. 1998.		The relative success of some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects. Systematic Biology 47: 264-281.
	Dickinson et al. 1987.		Another approach to leaf shape comparisons. Taxon 36: 1-20.
	Navarro, N, X. Zatarain & S. Montuire. 2004		Effects of morphometric descriptor changes on statistical classification and morphospaces. Biol . J. Linnean Soc. 83: 243-260.
	Fink, W. 1990.		Chp 1 Data acquisition for morphometric analysis in Systematic Biology. En: Rohlf J & F. L. Bookstein. Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2, The University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology. Ann Arbor. P 9-19.
	O´Higgins, P. O.		Chp 4. Methodological issues in the description of forms. En: P. E. Lestrel (ed). Fourier descriptors and their applications in Biology. Cambridge University Press. pp 74-105.
	Sheets, HD, et al. 2006.		Comparison of geometric morphometric outline methods in the discrimination of age-related differences in feather shape. Frontiers in Zoology 3: 15
Proyecciones: Espacios, Análisis de Procrustes, warps y TPS.
	Adams, D.C. F.J Rohlf & D. E. Slice, 2004		Geometric Morphometrics: Ten Years of progress following the ´revolution´. Italian Journal of Zoology 71: 5-16.
	Bookstein, F. L. 1996	Combining the tools of Geometric morphometrics. En: L. F. Marcus & al (eds). Advances in Morphometrics. Pp 131-151
	Bookstein, F. L. 1982.		Foundations of Morphometrics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 451-470.
	Monteiro, L. R. , B. Bordin & S. F. dos Reis. 2000.		Shape distances, shape spaces and the comparison of morphometric methods. TREE 15:217- 220.
	Richtsmeier, J. T. V. B. Deleon & S. R. Lele. 2002.	The promise of Geometric Morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 45: 68-91.
	Rohlf FJ. 1999.		Shape Statistics: Procrustes Superimpositions and Tangent Spaces. J. Classification 16: 197-223.
	Rohlf, F. J. and L. F. Marcus. 1993.		A revolution in Morphometrics. TREE 8(4): 129-132.
	Rohlf, F. J. 1996.		Morphometric spaces, shape components and the effects of linear transformations. En: L. F. Marcus & al (eds). Advances in Morphometrics. Pp 117-129.
	Rohlf, FJ & FL Bookstein 2003		Computing the Uniform Component of Shape Variation. Syst. Biol. 52: 66-69.
	Slice, D. E. 2001		Landmark Coordinates Aligned by Procrustes Analysis Do Not Lie in Kendall’s Shape Space. Syst. Biol 50: 141-149.
	Slice, D. E. 2005		Chp. 1. Modern Morphometrics. En: Slice, D. E. (ed). Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology. Kluwer Academic/ PLenum Press. New York. pp 1-45.
	Zelditch et al 2004		Chp. 1. Introduction. En: Zelditch ML, Swiderski, HD Sheets & WL Fink. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A primer. Elsevier Academic Press.
Estadistica: varianza, correlación
	Chatfield, C. 1988.		Chp 5. Analysing the data. General strategy. En: Problem solving: a statistician’s guide. Chapmann and Hall, p 13-21.
	Lele, S & J. T. Richtsmeier, 1990		Statistical models in Morphometrics: are they realistic?. Systematic Zoology: 39: 60-69.
	Lewontin, R.C. 1966.		On the measurement of relative variability. Systematic Zoology 141-142.
	Mayr E. 1969.		Chp 8, The qualitative and quantitative analysis of variation, En: "Principles of Systematic Zoology" McGraw-Hill. Pp 144-197.
	Staruss RE & MN Atanassov. 2006		Determining best complete subsets of specimens and characters for multivariate morphometric studies in the presence of large amounts of missing data. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 88: 309-328.
	SYSTAT. 1992.	Chp 1 Introduction to statistics. En: "Statistics Manual" Systat Inc.
	Stanley, J. 1963		Chp 12 The Analysis of Variance. En: The essence of biometry. McGill University Press. Montreal. P 120-126.
	Van Valen, L. 1978.	The statistics of variation. Evolutionary Theory 4: 33-43.
	Zar, J. H. 1996	Chp 1 Introduction, Chp 2 Populations and samples. Chp 3 Measures of central tendency, Chp 4 Measures of Dispersion and Variability. En: "Biostatistical Analysis" Prentice Hall. P1-45.
Metodos de ordenación: PCA, CVA.
	Chatfield, C. 1988		Appendix A.13 A digest of statistical techniques. Multivariate analysis. En: Problem solving. A statistician's guide. Chapman and Hall. p219-222.
	Albrecht, G. H. 1979	The study of Biological versus Statistical variation in multivariate morphometrics: the descriptive use of multiple regression analysis. Systematic Zoology 28: 338-344.
	Campbell, N. A. & W. R. Atchley. 1981.		The geometry of canonical variate analysis. Systematic Zoology 30: 268-280.
	James, F. C. and C. E. McCulloch. 1990.	Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora's box. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 129-166.
	Rohlf, F. J. & F. L. Bookstein. 1987	A comment on shearing as a method for "size correction". Systematic Zoology 36: 356-367.
	Somers, K. M. 1989.	Allometry, Isometry and shape in Principal Components Analysis. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 169-173.
	Sundberg P	Shape and size-constrained Principal Components Analysis. Systematic Zoology 38(2): 166-168.
Aplicaciones
	Gould S.J. 1971		Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a contribution to the problem of scaling in the evolution of size. American Naturalist 105: 113-135.
	Kellner, J. r. & R. A. Alford. 2003		The ontogeny of Fluctuating Asymmetry. The American Naturalist 161: 931-947.
	Rohlf, FJ 1998		On Applications of Geometric Morphometrics to studies of Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Systematic Biology 47: 147-158.
	Simpson et al 1960		Chp 15 Growth. En: Simpson, G. G., A. Roe & R. C. Lewontin. "Quantitative Zoology". Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York. P373-420.
	Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984.		Chp1 The size of living things, Chp 2 Problems of size and scale, Chp 3 The use of allometry. En: Scaling. Why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P 1-32.
	Smith 1990		Chp 17 Homology in morphometrics and phylogenetics. En: J. Rohlf & F. L. Bookstein (eds.). Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. Special Publication # 2. The University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology., Ann Arbor. pp. 325-338.
	Swiderski et al 1998	Swiderski, D. L., M. L. Zelditch and W. L. Fink. 1998. Why morphometrics is not special: coding quantitative data for phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 47: 508-519.
	Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, et al. 1995	Morphometrics, homology, and phylogenetics: quantified character as synapomorphies. Systematic Biology 44: 179-189.
	Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, et al. 1998.	On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: A reply to Rohlf. Systematic Biology 47(1): 159-167.
	Zelditch, M. L. and W. L. Fink. 1998.	Partial Warps, Phylogeny and Ontogeny: A reply to Adams and Rosenberg. Systematic Biology 47(2): 345-348.
	Zelditch et al 2000	Chp 3 Discovery of phylogenetic characters in morphometric data. En Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. J.J. Weins (ed). Smithsonian Institution Press. P37-83.

Casos de estudio

Para biólogos

Cardini A. & O*Higgins P. 2004. Patterns of morphological evolution in Marmota (Rodentia, Sciuridae): geometric morphometrics of the cranium in the context of marmot phylogeny, ecology and conservation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 385–407.

Fontaneto, D & G Melone. 2005. Do rotifer jaws grow after hatching? Hydrobiologia 46:213–221.

Frost, SR et al 2003.. Cranial Allometry, Phylogeography, and Systematics of Large-Bodied Papionins (Primates: Cercopithecinae) Inferred From Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Landmark Data. THE ANATOMICAL RECORD PART A 275A:1048–1072.

Guerrero, JA et al. 2003. Morphometrics in the quantification of character state identity for the assessment of primary homology: an analysis of character variation of the genus Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 45–55.

Guerrero JA et al. 2004. Taxonomic status of Artibeus jamaicensis tryomylus inferred from molecular and morphometric data. Journal of Mammalogy 85(5):866–874.

Hausmann S & AF. Lotter. 2001. Morphological variation within the diatom taxon Cyclotella comensis and its importance for quantitative temperature reconstructions. Freshwater Biology 46: 1323-1333.

Ibañez AL, IG Cowx & P. O`Higgins. 2007. Geometric morphometric analysis of fish scales for identifying genera, species, and local populations within the Muglilidae. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64: 1091-1100.

Jensen RJ et al. 2002. Lines, outlines and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475-492.

Klingenberg, CP et al. 2003. Body shape variation in cichlid fishes of the Amphilophus citrinellus species complex. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 397–408.

Langerhans, RB et al. 2003. Habitat-associated morphological divergence in two Neotropical fish species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 689–698.

Medel R et al. 2003. Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean monkey flower, Mimulus luteus. Ecology 84(7): 1721–1732.

Monteiro LR et al. 2002. Geometric estimates of heredability in biological shape. Evolution 56(3): 563–572.

Roserberg, MS. 2002. Fiddler crab claw shape variation: a geometric morphometric analysis across the genus Uca (Crustacea: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, 147–162.

Viguier, B. 2002. Is the morphological disparity of lemur skulls (Primates) controlled by phylogeny and/or environmental constraints? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76: 577–590.

Yokohama, N. et al. 2004. Craniological differentiation between European wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris), African wildcats (F. s. lybica) and Asian wildcats (F. s. ornata): implications for their evolution and conservation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004, 83, 47–63.

Para antropólogos

Bastir, M & A. Rosas. 2005. Hierarchical Nature of Morphological Integration and Modularity in the Human Posterior Face. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 128:26–34.

Berge, C & X. Penin. 2004. Ontogenetic Allometry, Heterochrony, and Interspeciﬁc Differences in the Skull of African Apes, Using Tridimensional Procrustes Analysis. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 124:124–138.

Bookstein, F et al. 1999. Comparing Frontal Cranial Profiles in Archaic and Modern Homo by Morphometric Analysis. THE ANATOMICAL RECORD (NEW ANAT.) 257:217–224.

Bulygina, E., P. Mitteroecker & L. Aiello. 2006. Ontogeny of Facial Dimorphism and Patterns of Individual Development Within One Human Population. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 131:432–443.

González JR, et al. 2005. Functional-Cranial Approach to the Inﬂuence of Economic Strategy on Skull Morphology. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 128:757–771.

Hennessy, RJ & CB Stringer. 2002. Geometric Morphometric Study of the Regional Variation of Modern Human Craniofacial Form. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 117:37–48.

Lieberman DE, BM MacBratney & G Krovitz. 2002. The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens. PNAS 99 (3): 1134-1139.

Lockwood CA, JM Lynch & WH Kimbel. 2002. Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics. J. ANAT. 201: 447-464.

Manriquez G., FE. González-Bergás, JC Salinas & O Espoueys. 2006. Deformación intencional del cráneo en poblaciones arqueológicas de Arica, Chile: Análisis preliminar de morfometría geométrica con uso de radiografías craneofaciales. Chungara 38: 13-34.

Martínez-Abadías, N. et al. 2006. Phenotypic Evolution of Human Craniofacial Morphology After Admixture: A Geometric Morphometrics Approach. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 387–398.

Penin, X., C. Berge & M. Baylac. 2002. Ontogenetic Study of the Skull in Modern Humans and the Common chimpanzees: Neotenic Hypothesis Reconsidered With a Tridimensional Procrustes Analysis. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 118:50–62.

Singleton, M. 2005. Functional Shape Variation in the Cercopithecine Masticatory Complex. p. 319- 348. En: Chpt. 15, Modern Morphometrics in Physical Anthropology, edited by Dennis E. Slice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

Bibliografía sobre Morfometría

Colección de referencias recientes desde Revistas que publican sus contenidos en formato RSS.

D Arcy: An online Bibliography of Landmark-based Morphometrics

Buscar más referencias sobre morfometría geométrica en Google Scholar

x x