Referencias básicas Sistemática Biogeografía Ecología Evolutiva
Sistemática (referencias recomendadas para el curso: Sistemática Filogenética, Profesores: Dr. Efraín De Luna, Dra. Dolores González) Sección 1: Bases teóricas de la sistemática Filosofía y Sistemática 1. Lundberg, J.G. and L.A. McDade. 1990. Systematics. In: Methods for Fish Biology. pp. 65-107. 2. De Luna, E. 1995. Bases filosóficas de los análisis cladísticos para la investigación taxonómica. Acta Botánica Mexicana 33: 63-79.  (92 kb)
3. Sober, E. 1993. Systematics. In: E. Sober (ed.). Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, pp. 143-183.
4. Farris, J.S. 1983. The Logical Basis of Phylogenetic Analysis. Advances in Cladistics 2: 7-35.
5. Sober, E. 1983. Parsimony in Systematics: Philosophical Issues. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 335-357.
6. De Luna, E. 1996. Epistemología de la Investigación Taxonómica: Inferencias Filogenéticas y su Evaluación. Bol. Soc. Bot. México 58: 43-53.
Sección 2: Análisis de Caracteres Homología y caracteres taxonómicos 7. Roth, V.L. 1988. The Biological Basis of Homology. In: C. J. Humpries (ed.). Ontogeny and Systematics. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 1-26.
8. de Pinna, M.C. 1991. Concepts and tests of Homology in the Cladistic Paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.
9. De Luna, E. and B.D. Mishler. 1996. El concepto de Homología Filogenética y la selección de caracteres taxonómicos. Bol. Soc. Bot. México 59: 131-146. (3928 kb)
10. Hawkings, J. , C.E. Huges and R.W. Scotland. 1997. Primary Homology Assessment, Characters and Character States. Cladistics 13: 275-283. Variación de caracteres morfológicos y moleculares 11. Reyment, R.A. 1969. Biometrical Techniques in Systematics. In: C. G. Sibley (ed.). Systematic Biology. Proceedings of an International Conference. Natl. Acad. Sc. Publ., pp. 542-594.
12. Gift, N. and P.F. Stevens. 1997. Vagaries in the delimitation of character states in quantitative variation- an experimental study. Syst. Biol. 46: 112-125.
13. Guerrero, J. A., E. De Luna and C. Sanchez. 2003. Morphometrics in the quantification of character state identity for the assessment of primary homology: an analysis of character variation of the genus Artibeus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 45-55. (149 kb)
14. González, D. 1998. Marcadores moleculares para los estudios comparativos de la variación en Ecología y Sistemática. Revista Mexicana de Micología 14: 1-21. 15. 16. González, D. 1997. El uso de secuencias génicas para estudios taxonómicos. Bol. Soc. Bot. México
17. Hillis, D. M. and J. J. Wiens. 2000. Molecules vs. morphology in systematics. In: J. J. Wiens (ed.). Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data. Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 1-19. 18. Doyle, J.J. 1993. DNA, Phylogeny, and the Flowering of Plant Systematics. BioScience 43: 380-389. 19. Pimentel, R.A. and R. Riggins. 1987. The Nature of Cladistic data. Cladistics 3: 201-209.
20. Mabee, P.M. 1989. Assumptions Underlying the Use of Ontogenetic Sequences for Determining Character State Order. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 118: 151-158.
20. Platnick. 1991. On missing entries in cladistic analyses. Cladistics 7: 337-343.
21. Kornet, D.J. and H. Turner. 1999. Coding Polimorphism for Phylogeny Reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 48: 365-379. Polaridad 22. Kluge, A.G. 1985. Ontogeny and Phylogenetic Systematics. Cladistics 1: 13-27.
23. Nixon, K.C. and J.M. Carpenter. 1993. On Outgroups. Cladistics 9: 413-426.
24. Keller P., R.A. 1998. ¿Para qué nos sirve el método de Grupo Externo en los análisis cladísticos? In: R. A. Keller P. Bases metodológicas del uso de grupo externo en los análisis cladísticos. Tesis de Licenciatura. Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, México. pp. 11-36. Pesos 25. Wheeler, Q.D. 1986. Character weighting and cladistic analysis. Syst. Zool. 35: 102-109.
26. Neff, N. A. 1986. A rational basis for a priori character weighting. Syst. Zool. 35: 110-123.
27. Kitching, I.J., P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and D.M. Williams. 1998. Measures of character fit and character weighting. In: Cladistics. The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 92-117.
28. Steel, M. and D. Penny. 2000. Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Role of Models in Molecular Phylogenetics. Mol.Biol.Evol. 17: 839-850.
29. Lewis, P.O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 30-37.
30. Posada D. 2003. Selecting models of evolution. In: Vandemme AM and Salemi M (eds.). The Phylogenetic Handbook. Cambridge University Press.
Sección 3: Análisis cladísticos Linajes 31. Sober, E. 1992. Monophyly. In: E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd (eds.). Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Harvard University Press, pp. 202-207.
32. Walsh, S.L. 1998. The History and semantics of the "Monophyly Debate". Evolutionary Theory 11: 307-323.
33. Abbot, L.A., F.A. Bisby and D.J Rogers. 1985. Phenetic Classification. In: L. A. Abbot, Bisby, F.A. & Rogers, D.J (eds.). Taxonomic Analysis in Biology. Columbia University Press, pp. 144-187.
34. Sokal, R. R. and J. H. Camin. 1965. The two taxonomies: areas of agreement and conflict. Syst. Zool 14: 176-195.
35. Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 221-235 pp. Construcción de hipótesis filogenéticas 36. Soltis, P. and D. Soltis. 1996. Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Molecular Data Sets. Bol. Soc. Bot. México 59: 99-113.
37. Nixon, K.C. 1999. The Parsimony Ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
38. Kitching, I.J., P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and D.M. Williams. 1998. Cladogram construction, character polarity and rooting. In: Cladistics. The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 38-49.
39. Holder, M and P. O. Lewis. 2003. Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nature 4: 275-284. Evaluación de hipótesis filogenéticas 40. Sanderson, M.J. and M.J. Donoghue. 1989. Patterns of Variation in Levels of Homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1871-1795.
41. Kallersjo, M, V. Albert and J. Farris. 1999. Homoplasy increases phylogenetic structure. Cladistics 15: 91-97.
42. Bremer, K. 1994. Branch Support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
43. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
44. Kitching, I.J., P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and D.M. Williams. 1998. Support and confidence statistics for cladograms and groups. In: Cladistics. The Theory and Practice of Parsimony Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 118-138.
45. de Queiroz, A. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 657-681.
46. Hillis, D.M. 1998. Taxonomic Sampling, Phylogenetic Accuracy, and Investigator Bias. Syst. Biol. 47: 3-8.
47. Graybeal, A. 1998. Is It Better to Add Taxa or Characters to a Difficult Phylogenetic Problem? Syst. Biol. 47: 9-17.
48. Barrett, M., M.J. Donoghue and E. Sober. 1991. Against Consensus. Syst. Zool. 40: 486-493.
49. Eernisse, D.J. and A.G. Kluge. 1993. Taxonomic Congruence versus Total Evidence, and Amniote Phylogeny Inferred from Fossils, Molecules, and Morphology. Mol.Biol.Evol. 16: 1170-1195.
50. Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or Bootstrap? A Simulation Study Comparing the Performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sampling and Bootstraping in Assessing Phylogenetic Phylogenetic Confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20(2): 255-266. Concepto de Especie y clasificación 51. Mishler, B.D. 1987. Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept. Biology and Philosophy 2: 397-414.
52. Mishler, B.D. and E. De Luna. 1997. Sistemática filogenética y el concepto de especie. Biol. Soc. Bot. México 60: 45-57. (3571 kb)
53. Cracraft, J. 2000. Species Concepts in Theoretical and Applied Biology: a systematic debate with consequences. In: Q. D. M. Wheeler, R. (ed.). Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 3-14.
54. Christoffersen, M.L. 1995. Cladistic Taxonomy, Phylogenetic Systematics, and Evolutionary Ranking. Syst. Biol. 44: 440-454.
55. Keller, R. A., R.N. Boyd and Q. D. Wheeler. 2003. The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. The Botanical Review 69(1): 93-110.
56. Moore, G. 1998. A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47: 561-579.
Sección 4: Síntesis general Impacto 57. Wanntorp, H. E., D.R. Brooks, T. Nilsson, S. Nylin, F. Ronquist, S.C. Stearns and N. Wedell. 1990. Phylogenetic approaches in ecology. Oikos 57: 119-132.
58. Morrone, J.J. and J.C. Crisci. 1995. Historical Biogeography: Introduction to Methods. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26: 373-401.
59. Cracraft, J. The seven great questions of Systematic Biology: an essential foundation for conservation and the sustainable use of biodiversity. Ann. Mis. Bot Garden 89(2): 127-144. Problemas persistentes 60. Mishler, B.D. 1994. Cladistic Analysis of Molecular and Morphological Data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 94: 143-156.
61. Goloboff, P. A. 2003. Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity. Cladistics 19: 91-103.
62. Kluge, A.G. 1997. Testability and the Refutation and Corroboration of Cladistic Hypothesis. Cladistics 13: 81-96.
63. Kluge, A.G. and A.J. Wolf. 1993. Cladistics: what´s in a word. Cladistics 9: 183-199.
64. de Pinna, M.C. 1996. Comparative Biology and Systematics: Some controversies in retrospective. J. Comp. Biol. 1: 3-16. |
